[12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. But no scientific discovery has proved so ripe for spiritual projection as the theories of quantum physics, replete with their quixotic qualities of uncertainty, simultaneity and parallelism." log out. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. What The Bleep Do We Know But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. The comments focus primarily on a single theme: "We create our own reality." Your session to The Christian They want suggestions, not formulas. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). So does classical physics. or call us at 1-617-450-2300. What are some of the ocean conspiracy theories that you actually But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. 6. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. What The Bleep!? Down The Rabbit Hole | Documentary Heaven Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? Real news, real hope. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. If COVID-19 mRNA is safe where are the libel lawsuits by Pharma? It was one of the most important moments in history. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . John Haglin Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . PDF Hidden Messages In Water Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. What the Bleep Do We Know!? [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. Down The Rabbit Hole\". Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Even so it notched up $10m in. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006) - IMDb Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Amit Gotswami How quantum physicists 'review' the 'Bleep' movie But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. There's nothing wrong with that. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. What the #$*! Do We Know!? (Film) - TV Tropes In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. !" is a radical departure from convention. Not everything is possible. Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? How to spot quantum quackery - NBC News By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Philosophy Meaning of Arntz' Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" - 850 I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. " !" | (1080p Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? Q: But isn't everything really connected? 34 talking about this. You are free to comment as you wish. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: What The Bleep Do We Know | PDF | Reality | Brain - Scribd What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2004 "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. Q: You do see that in some science . Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. is god-awful. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC 8. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. This will be revisited if any. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. 3. I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? - Letterboxd For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. What The Bleep Do We Know?! - Amazon Prime Video Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? Do we know" . Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. What the Bleep Do We (K)now!? Online Trivia | W | 10 Questions But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. and published a study guide. That's not always true, but it's often true. It's certainly not. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. Moon landing conspiracy theories aren't true - here's how we know The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. (I haven't). Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. . "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Has this experiment been replicated or verified? What the Bleep!? 2. Our work isn't possible without your support. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. Review of the What the Bleep Do We Know? - Christian Research Institute Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. It is just a movie. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - WatchDocumentaries.com Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail.
Alastair Mackenzie Wife, Articles W
Alastair Mackenzie Wife, Articles W